Level 1: Recognition · Question 1 of 2
✎ We’re currently reviewing all our questions and will mark this one as reviewed soon. Use it for practice; it isn’t legal advice. Which set of requirements did the House of Lords in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 identify as the control mechanisms governing a secondary victim's claim for psychiatric injury? A. A close tie of love and affection with the primary victim; proximity in time and space to the shocking event or its immediate aftermath; and perception of the event through the claimant's own unaided senses.B. Presence within the zone of foreseeable physical danger, foreseeability of physical injury, and an eggshell-skull susceptibility.C. The existence of an employment or rescuer relationship conferring special status, together with proof of a recognised psychiatric illness.D. A contractual relationship with the defendant, reasonable foreseeability of financial loss, and reliance on the defendant.