{"id":14611,"date":"2023-07-12T13:20:56","date_gmt":"2023-07-12T13:20:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=14611"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:47:13","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:47:13","slug":"case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194, the principle under Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] 12 ChD 31, stating that all &#8220;continuous and apparent easements&#8221; necessary for the enjoyment of land would be passed to the grantee, was examined<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Wheeldon v Burrows established that a quasi-easement would be implied by grant if it was permanent and appropriate for exercise<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A piece of land hosted a cottage (the Old Fields Cottage) to its northern boundary and this cottage was adjacent to the Old Fields Farm (the cottage fell towards the farm\u2019s southern wall)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Old Fields Cottage was conveyed to the previous purchaser before C in 1928, granting him the right to use the farmyard for unloading coal and use water supplies subject to \u2018all rights of way water and other easements (if any) affecting the same\u2019<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The property with the cottage was conveyed to C (the plaintiff; the claimant) in 1954 on the same terms as stated above<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>D\u2019s husband became a tenant of the Old Fields Farm in 1942<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In 1955, C wanted to install a bathroom in his cottage and accordingly received permission by the rector to lay drains through the farmyard and connect these drains to a septic tank on his own premises<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In 1958, D herself purchased the farm as a freehold property in a conveyance on C\u2019s aforementioned rights<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The rector gave permission for the drains to remain there without a time limit, though no mention was made of the effluent<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The water coming onto C\u2019s premises came through D\u2019s land and in 1956, C disconnected the old drain; a year late, both drains were torn up by a cloudburst and were never replaced<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>As such, C could only maintain the cottage wall and clean the gutters and windows through entering D\u2019s property<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C went into D\u2019s farmyard to do maintenance work between 1954-158, without D\u2019s permission<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In late-1958, D refused to allow C to enter his property, dismissing C\u2019s such right<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C maintained that his right to enter C\u2019s farmyard was exercisable until 1960 when his cottage\u2019s gutters got blocked; until then, C had not entered the property after D\u2019s refusal in 1958; damp was seeping into C\u2019s cottage<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>D refused C\u2019s entry, despite warnings by C\u2019s solicitors that they could trigger proceedings against D\u2019s disruption of C exercising their right<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C sought an injunction to retrain D from interfering with their right of entry<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>D alleged that the drains laid under her farmyard constituted trespass; C argued that he was entitled to an easement of drainage through those exact drains<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the High Court (Chancery Division)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>C\u2019s right to enter D\u2019s farmyard for maintenance purposes was capable of being an easement and it would not amount to a substantial interference with D\u2019s land<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C\u2019s right was not implied under the principle of Wheeldon v Burrows, though under s.62 of the Law of Property Act 1925, it became an easement<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Ungoed-Thomas J.<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Considered C\u2019s evidence more compelling and awarded an injunction to prevent D from interfering with C\u2019s maintenance<\/p><div id=\"caree-449980526\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u2018Therefore, it follows, in my view, from the cases that I have cited that an equity arises for the plaintiff to have those drains there for an indefinite time for the purpose of taking the bath water from his cottage down the drains and so from his own property. The right being indefinite, again in the circumstances, to my mind, is such as to constitute an equity of a permanent nature. So that the right to the equity to have the drains there is permanent.\u2019 [at pp.242-243]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u2018It seems to me that in these circumstances, having regard to the nature of this claim to the passage of effluent through the drain, and to the circumstances in which the drains were laid with the defendant&#8217;s consent and with her knowledge, that I should not grant the defendant the equitable relief by way of injunction which she claims.\u2019 [at p.244]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u2018Suffice it to say that my conclusion is that the plaintiff&#8217;s action in putting the pipe across the line of the old drain was not the cause of any damage resulting to the defendant&#8217;s property by flooding, as she alleges.\u2019 [at p.246]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues in Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194 Held by the High Court (Chancery Division) Ungoed-Thomas J. Considered C\u2019s evidence more compelling and awarded an injunction to prevent D from interfering with C\u2019s maintenance<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-14611","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194, the principle under Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] 12 ChD 31, stating that all &quot;continuous and apparent easements&quot; necessary for the enjoyment of land would be passed to the grantee, was examined\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194, the principle under Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] 12 ChD 31, stating that all &quot;continuous and apparent easements&quot; necessary for the enjoyment of land would be passed to the grantee, was examined\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-12T13:20:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:47:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-12T13:20:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:47:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194\"},\"wordCount\":731,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-12T13:20:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:47:13+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194, the principle under Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] 12 ChD 31, stating that all \\\"continuous and apparent easements\\\" necessary for the enjoyment of land would be passed to the grantee, was examined\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194, the principle under Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] 12 ChD 31, stating that all \"continuous and apparent easements\" necessary for the enjoyment of land would be passed to the grantee, was examined","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194","og_description":"In the case of Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194, the principle under Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] 12 ChD 31, stating that all \"continuous and apparent easements\" necessary for the enjoyment of land would be passed to the grantee, was examined","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-12T13:20:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:47:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194","datePublished":"2023-07-12T13:20:56+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:47:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194"},"wordCount":731,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194","name":"Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-12T13:20:56+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:47:13+00:00","description":"In the case of Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194, the principle under Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] 12 ChD 31, stating that all \"continuous and apparent easements\" necessary for the enjoyment of land would be passed to the grantee, was examined","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ward-v-kirkland-1967-ch-194#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14611\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}