{"id":14239,"date":"2023-07-09T15:54:17","date_gmt":"2023-07-09T15:54:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=14239"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:45:44","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:45:44","slug":"case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379, it was established that the defences of <em>ex turpi causa non oritur actio<\/em> and <em>volenti non fit injuria<\/em>, do not apply if the injury arising from an out of proportion fight. This case also established that provocation could not amount to fault under s1(1) of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>C, aged 64, lived in a quiet court<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Backing onto this was a caf\u00e9 which the D, aged 23, ran<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C was out enjoying the when the D\u2019s wife hurled abuse at him from her first-story window; he shouted back at her<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>D asked C what he said, C replied he wanted to see him on his own, implying he wanted a fight<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>D came out and a fight ensued with C throwing a punch at D\u2019s shoulder<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C was severely struck by D in the eye, which caused him to get 19 stitches, an operation, and a month in the hospital<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C claimed for damages, D raised the defences of <em>ex turpi causa non oritur actio<\/em> and <em>volenti non fit injuria<\/em>, and claimed C\u2019s injuries were contributed to by the C himself<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Did the defences of illegality and voluntary assumption of risk apply to such a fight?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Did the C\u2019s provocation amount to contributory negligence under s1(1) of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the Court of Appeal<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Appeal allowed. The defences did not apply; the D was found to be liable in damages for the entirety of C\u2019s injury. C\u2019s provocation did not reduce the damages suffered to him, and it did not amount to contributory negligence under the Act. The damages were increased from \u00a375 to \u00a3300.<\/p><div id=\"caree-3635042617\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Lord Denning M.R.<\/strong> &nbsp;<strong>[386 \u2013 8]<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Were damages recoverable for the assault on C?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Yes. One can sue another if injury \u201cwas inflicted by a weapon or savage blow out of all proportion to the occasion\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cBut he does not take on himself the risk of a savage blow out of all proportion to the occasion\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cThe man who strikes a blow of such severity is liable in damages unless he can prove accident or self-defence.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Noting that the judge previously had cases considered by the High Court of Australia, Denning L held that court would be the Court of Appeal\u2019s guide in the present case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As to the provocation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u201cProvocation by the plaintiff can properly be used to take away any element of aggravation. But not to reduce the real damages.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Lord Justice Salmon<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Unfair to punish the C<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u201cI reject the contention that because a plaintiff, who has suffered a civil wrong, has behaved badly this is a matter which a court may take into account when awarding him compensatory damages for physical injuries which he has sustained as the result of the wrong which has been unlawfully inflicted on him\u201d [390]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cIt is impossible to hold that what the plaintiff did, however rude or silly or cantankerous, amounted to contributory negligence\u201d [393]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Lord Justice Winn<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Looking to the Act, \u201cThere was nothing in the plaintiff&#8217;s conduct which could constitute a &#8220;fault&#8221; within the definition of &#8220;fault&#8221; in section 1 (1)\u201d [393]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points: Facts of Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379 Issues in Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379 Held by the Court of Appeal Appeal allowed. The defences did not apply; the D was found to be liable in damages for the entirety of C\u2019s injury. C\u2019s provocation did not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-14239","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379, it was established that the defences of ex turpi causa non oritur actio and volenti non fit injuria, do not apply if the injury arising from an out of proportion fight.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379, it was established that the defences of ex turpi causa non oritur actio and volenti non fit injuria, do not apply if the injury arising from an out of proportion fight.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-09T15:54:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:45:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-09T15:54:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:45:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379\"},\"wordCount\":545,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-09T15:54:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:45:44+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379, it was established that the defences of ex turpi causa non oritur actio and volenti non fit injuria, do not apply if the injury arising from an out of proportion fight.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379, it was established that the defences of ex turpi causa non oritur actio and volenti non fit injuria, do not apply if the injury arising from an out of proportion fight.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379","og_description":"In the case of Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379, it was established that the defences of ex turpi causa non oritur actio and volenti non fit injuria, do not apply if the injury arising from an out of proportion fight.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-09T15:54:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:45:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379","datePublished":"2023-07-09T15:54:17+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:45:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379"},"wordCount":545,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379","name":"Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-09T15:54:17+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:45:44+00:00","description":"In the case of Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379, it was established that the defences of ex turpi causa non oritur actio and volenti non fit injuria, do not apply if the injury arising from an out of proportion fight.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-lane-v-holloway-1968-1-qb-379#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Lane v Holloway [1968] 1 QB 379"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14239","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14239"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14239\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}