{"id":14215,"date":"2023-07-09T15:40:39","date_gmt":"2023-07-09T15:40:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=14215"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:45:37","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:45:37","slug":"case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785, the comfort letter did not have contractual effect because there was no information regarding the company\u2019s future performance; the comfort letter was only about present conduct.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>This contract case is related to company law meaning how companies operate.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>This case raises questions about where responsibility to cover the debt lies after a company goes into liquidation even though it still owes the bank loan payments.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>C claimed damages against D for breaching a warranty. This warranty dictated that D would ensure M.M.C. Metals would fulfil its financial obligations to C.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The lower courts held D had contractual obligations to C because of the assertions in the comfort letter.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>D appealed arguing that the letter of comforts from 1984 and 1985 respectively indicate contractual promises regarding future conduct.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>More specifically D contended the contractual promises stated the merchant bankers would ensure that M.M.C. Metals would meet its liabilities at all times.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The main question of the case: do the phrases in paragraph 3 of the letter constitute as a warranty or contractual promise?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Is there an intention to create legal relations?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Does the letter of intent establish a legally binding contract?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by Court of Appeal<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Appeal allowed &#8211; D made an explicit statement regarding their policy that no promise regarding future policy was made or implied. D successfully claimed their statement of present fact was that the subsidary could pay its debts therefore the provisions of the letter of comfort was not legally binding.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Ralph Gibson L.J<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Intention to create legal relations<\/p><div id=\"caree-1820995823\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The letter of comfort was only used in the negotiation stage. The judge disagrees with previous judges instead he held the letters of comfort express the parties&#8217; legal relationship.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>There were no express terms to indicate a contractual promise. Paragraph 3 is a representation of fact.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cThe absence of express words of warranty as to present facts or the absence of express words of promise as to future conduct does not conclusively exclude a statement from the status of warranty or promise.\u201d [390]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cThe plain meaning of those words, without the addition contained in Hirst J.&#8217;s formulation of its meaning, does fit the factual background.\u201d [393]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>According to the judge, the burden of proof that there was no intention to create legal intention lies with &#8220;the party who asserts that no legal effect was intended, and the onus is a heavy one&#8221;. Edwards v Skyways [1964] 1 WLR 349 [355]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Relevant contractual promise<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Paragraph 3 of the letter is not a contractual promise. It does not give any indication to future intentions. This case heavily considers Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd. v. Mardon [1976] Q.B. 801 \u2013 a misrepresentation case where the words were held to be a warranty.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cIf my view of this case is correct, the plaintiffs have suffered grave financial loss as a result of the collapse of the tin market and the following decision by the defendants not to honour a moral responsibility which they assumed in order to gain for their subsidiary the finance necessary for the trading operations which the defendants wished that subsidiary to pursue.\u201d [394]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues Held by Court of Appeal Ralph Gibson L.J Intention to create legal relations Relevant contractual promise<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-14215","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785, the comfort letter did not have contractual effect because there was no information regarding the company\u2019s future performance; the comfort letter was only about present conduct.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785, the comfort letter did not have contractual effect because there was no information regarding the company\u2019s future performance; the comfort letter was only about present conduct.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-09T15:40:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:45:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-09T15:40:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:45:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785\"},\"wordCount\":541,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-09T15:40:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:45:37+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785, the comfort letter did not have contractual effect because there was no information regarding the company\u2019s future performance; the comfort letter was only about present conduct.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785, the comfort letter did not have contractual effect because there was no information regarding the company\u2019s future performance; the comfort letter was only about present conduct.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785","og_description":"In the case of Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785, the comfort letter did not have contractual effect because there was no information regarding the company\u2019s future performance; the comfort letter was only about present conduct.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-09T15:40:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:45:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785","datePublished":"2023-07-09T15:40:39+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:45:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785"},"wordCount":541,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785","name":"Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-09T15:40:39+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:45:37+00:00","description":"In the case of Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785, the comfort letter did not have contractual effect because there was no information regarding the company\u2019s future performance; the comfort letter was only about present conduct.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-kleinwort-benson-ltd-v-malaysia-mining-corp-1989-1-all-er-785#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] 1 All ER 785"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14215"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14215\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}