{"id":14165,"date":"2023-07-08T19:49:51","date_gmt":"2023-07-08T19:49:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=14165"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:45:26","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:45:26","slug":"case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The case of John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 concerned the remoteness of damage in the context of a breach of contract. The classic test for remoteness from <em>Hadley v Baxendale [1854] <\/em>\u00a0was upheld after confusion following <em>The Achilleas<\/em> <em>case [2008]<\/em>. However some cases may need to be considered further to give the commercial context to the contract involved.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The appellant company JGP provided consulting engineering and geological services<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The D respondent, Gubbins, was a farmer who obtained planning permission to develop a field for residential purposes adjacent to a road<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>He was required by the local authority to build a road<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>As is usual in these circumstances, Gubbins intended for the local authority to maintain the being constructed to support the residential buildings, at public expense<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>JGP was contracted by the D to design he road but was unable to deliver the design in time resulting in the D not being able to obtain council permission for the construction<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>This made D suffer a large loss due to market price fall when the construction was finally completed and sold<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C claimed the contractual price and D counterclaimed for breach of contract by the C<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The court found in favour of the D, the C appealed<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Would the C be found liable for the loss suffered by the D due to the fall in market price?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the Court of Appeal<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Appeal dismissed \u2013 the C was found liable for the loss suffered due to the fall in market price. The judges agreed with the previous decision that the loss was reasonably foreseeable, and there was no evidence found in the favour of the C excluding his assumption of responsibility.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Sir David Keene<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Sir David Keene noted that the previous case of The Achilleas was not to depart wholly from the well-established test of remoteness from Baxendale. It was to stress \u201cthat what was reasonably foreseeable might sometime not prevail as the test if there were particular circumstances demonstrating that the parties could not have contracted on the basis that the defendant was to bear the liability of a particular kind of loss, even though reasonably foreseeable as a \u201cnot unlikely\u201d consequence of breach\u201d [20]<\/p><div id=\"caree-4010070808\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Furthermore, \u201cif there is evidence in a particular case that the nature of the contract and the commercial background, or indeed other relevant special circumstances, render that implied assumption of responsibility inappropriate for a type of loss, then the contract-breaker escapes liability.\u201d [24]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In the present case, it was held by the Court of Appeal that the previous judge\u2019s approach to legal principles, and summaries, could not be faulted [25]:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The loss from the market price fall was reasonably foreseeable, JGP \u201cknew that the property market could go up or down and knew what Mr. Gubbins intended to do by way of development\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nor did the case fall outside the case of Baxendale<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Whilst one cannot control the market price, damages for loss due to changes int eh market price have previously been awarded for example <em>The Heron II<\/em>; this case is no different. It may differ in a case of an \u201cunusually volatile\u201d market, which this one was not. [27]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The \u201cegregious delay \u2026 in the present case gave rise to a quantifiable loss\u201d [29]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This quantifiable loss being disproportionate to the fee payable by the D to the C under contract did not matter here [30]:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u201cthe breach of a contract of modest size gives rise to a substantial claim in damages\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cany such contrast is merely one possible pointer towards a contracting party not having undertaken a potential liability which is reasonably foreseeable and by itself would not normally suffice to establish such an absence of responsibility. It does not do so here.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 Issues in John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 Held by the Court of Appeal Sir David Keene Sir David Keene noted that the previous case of The Achilleas was not to depart wholly from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-14165","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The case of John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 concerned the remoteness of damage in the context of a breach of contract.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The case of John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 concerned the remoteness of damage in the context of a breach of contract.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-08T19:49:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:45:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-08T19:49:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:45:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37\"},\"wordCount\":650,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-08T19:49:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:45:26+00:00\",\"description\":\"The case of John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 concerned the remoteness of damage in the context of a breach of contract.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"The case of John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 concerned the remoteness of damage in the context of a breach of contract.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37","og_description":"The case of John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 concerned the remoteness of damage in the context of a breach of contract.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-08T19:49:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:45:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37","datePublished":"2023-07-08T19:49:51+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:45:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37"},"wordCount":650,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37","name":"Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-08T19:49:51+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:45:26+00:00","description":"The case of John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 concerned the remoteness of damage in the context of a breach of contract.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-john-grimes-partnership-limited-v-gubbins-2013-ewca-civ-37#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: John Grimes Partnership Limited v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14165\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}