{"id":14115,"date":"2023-07-08T16:28:55","date_gmt":"2023-07-08T16:28:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=14115"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:45:05","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:45:05","slug":"case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656, it was held that where two fellow servants combine to disobey an order deliberately, knowing the risk involved, and are hurt, volenti non fit injuria-coming to the injury-is a complete defence for their employer in an action by either based on the employer&#8217;s vicarious liability for the other&#8217;s negligence or breach of statutory duty. The forbidden act being a deliberate breach of statute does not affect the application of volenti non fit injuria to an action against the employer or fellow servant.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>C was employed by D as a qualified shot-firer in a quarry.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>On 28th June 1960, C worked in a three-man team placing explosives to run blasting operations in the quarry.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>After the explosives were placed and the detonators affixed, C\u2019s team were to perform a \u2018continuity test.\u2019<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>This involved sending an electric current through the charges\u2019 wiring to a galvanometer to show that the charges were primed without destroying them.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>D had given orders in 1959 that any testing in future must be done from a shelter. This was made a statutory regulation in February 1960.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>While one man went to get a longer cable, C and the remaining man, X, chose to perform the test against the regulations. Both men were injured, with C sustaining serious injuries.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Was there a causal link between X\u2019s negligence and C\u2019s injuries, for which D was vicariously liable as their employer?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Could D raise the complete defence of volenti non fit injuria; that C had consented to run the risk, thereby accepting all responsibility?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the House of Lords<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Finding for D, that there was a causal link between X\u2019s negligence and C\u2019s injuries, and D was vicariously liable for X\u2019s conduct.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C had consented to run the risk, and D was therefore not liable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Lord Reid<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>C admitted in evidence that he knew that D had determined that the continuity tests could be unsafe and had fired people for going against regulations. C admitted that they would only need to wait 10 minutes until the other man returned with the long wires. C\u2019s only excuse was that he could not be bothered to wait.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It is far from clear that C would have done the test if X had not agreed with him. More importantly, X collaborated with C in completing the test unlawfully. That collaboration may not have amounted to much, but it was not negligible.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If X had been suing in respect of his damage it would be clear that both had contributed to the accident but that the greater part of the fault must be attributed to C.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recently volenti non fit injuria has been considered a dying defence. In most cases where the defence would be available, contributory negligence has been favoured.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It must be held that C fully appreciated the risk. C knew that those better qualified than he was took the risk seriously. He knew that D had forbidden this practice and that it had then been prohibited by statutory regulation. No shot-firer could be in any doubt about the possible consequences of that.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cFinally, C argues that there is a general rule that the defence of volenti non fit injuria is not available where there has been a breach of a statutory obligation. It would be odd if that were so. In the present case the prohibition of testing except from a shelter had been imposed by D before the statutory prohibition was made. So, it would mean that if C had deliberately done what he did in full knowledge of the risk the day before the statutory prohibition was made this defence would have been open to D, but if he had done the same thing the day after the regulation came into operation it would not\u201d [673D].<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>An employer who persistently refuses to comply with statute could not be allowed to escape liability because the injured workman agreed to waive the breach. If it is still permissible for a workman to agree to work under an unsafe system, there would be a difference between the employer\u2019s breach of statutory obligation and breach of his common law obligation to exercise due care. But that is irrelevant to this case.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues Held by the House of Lords Lord Reid<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-14115","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656, it was held that where two fellow servants combine to disobey an order deliberately, knowing the risk involved, and are hurt, volenti non fit injuria-coming to the injury-is a complete defence for their employer in an action by either based on the employer&#039;s vicarious liability for the other&#039;s negligence or breach of statutory duty. The forbidden act being a deliberate breach of statute does not affect the application of volenti non fit injuria to an action against the employer or fellow servant.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656, it was held that where two fellow servants combine to disobey an order deliberately, knowing the risk involved, and are hurt, volenti non fit injuria-coming to the injury-is a complete defence for their employer in an action by either based on the employer&#039;s vicarious liability for the other&#039;s negligence or breach of statutory duty. The forbidden act being a deliberate breach of statute does not affect the application of volenti non fit injuria to an action against the employer or fellow servant.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-08T16:28:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:45:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-08T16:28:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:45:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656\"},\"wordCount\":733,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-08T16:28:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:45:05+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656, it was held that where two fellow servants combine to disobey an order deliberately, knowing the risk involved, and are hurt, volenti non fit injuria-coming to the injury-is a complete defence for their employer in an action by either based on the employer's vicarious liability for the other's negligence or breach of statutory duty. The forbidden act being a deliberate breach of statute does not affect the application of volenti non fit injuria to an action against the employer or fellow servant.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656, it was held that where two fellow servants combine to disobey an order deliberately, knowing the risk involved, and are hurt, volenti non fit injuria-coming to the injury-is a complete defence for their employer in an action by either based on the employer's vicarious liability for the other's negligence or breach of statutory duty. The forbidden act being a deliberate breach of statute does not affect the application of volenti non fit injuria to an action against the employer or fellow servant.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656","og_description":"In the case of ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656, it was held that where two fellow servants combine to disobey an order deliberately, knowing the risk involved, and are hurt, volenti non fit injuria-coming to the injury-is a complete defence for their employer in an action by either based on the employer's vicarious liability for the other's negligence or breach of statutory duty. The forbidden act being a deliberate breach of statute does not affect the application of volenti non fit injuria to an action against the employer or fellow servant.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-08T16:28:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:45:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656","datePublished":"2023-07-08T16:28:55+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:45:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656"},"wordCount":733,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656","name":"Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-08T16:28:55+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:45:05+00:00","description":"In the case of ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656, it was held that where two fellow servants combine to disobey an order deliberately, knowing the risk involved, and are hurt, volenti non fit injuria-coming to the injury-is a complete defence for their employer in an action by either based on the employer's vicarious liability for the other's negligence or breach of statutory duty. The forbidden act being a deliberate breach of statute does not affect the application of volenti non fit injuria to an action against the employer or fellow servant.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ici-ltd-b-shatwell-1965-a-c-656#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: ICI Ltd b Shatwell [1965] A.C. 656"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14115\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}