{"id":14078,"date":"2023-07-07T21:52:27","date_gmt":"2023-07-07T21:52:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=14078"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:44:56","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:44:56","slug":"case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 concerning company law, the appellant appealed against a decision finding him to be a shareholder in the respondent\u2019s company.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Key takeaway:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Where it is expressly or impliedly authorized by the contractual parties that acceptance of an offer could be posted, the contract was sound upon posting the acceptance. This is irrelevant as to whether the delivery was delayed.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The \u201cpostal rule\u201d was developed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Grant (G) appealed against a decision finding him to be a shareholder in the respondent company (H).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>G had applied for shares in H and a letter was sent alerting him of this.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>G never received the letter.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>H then went into liquidation and the liquidator sought to recover funds by asking G for the shares.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>G denied being a shareholder of H<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>G argued that for him to be a shareholder, the shares should have been communicated to him and a letter posted and not received did not amount to acceptance or \u2018communication\u2019.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Household Fire Insurance v Grant&nbsp;1879 4 EX D 216<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>When was acceptance to a contract if the offeree was never aware of the acceptance.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Did a letter posted constitute communication and acceptance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by Court of Appeal<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Held by Baggallay and Thesiger, L.JJ., Bramwell, L.J., dissenting, that the defendant was a shareholder.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Baggallay and Thesiger, L.JJ.,<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>G was a shareholder.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The application for shares in H by post held no distinction in terms of acceptance by a delay in delivery by the Post Office and its failure to deliver at all.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The decision although occasionally inconvenient, it was impossible to adjust conflicting rights of the parties such that the consequences following a mistake on the part of a mutual agent, being the Post Office in this case, were borne equally by all the parties.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Bramwell, L.J., dissenting<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u201c<\/strong>It seems to me that the correct way to deal with those expressions is to refer them to the subject-matter, and not to consider them as laying down such a proposition as the plaintiffs have contended for, but that when the post may be used between the parties it must be subject to those delays which are unavoidable.\u201d It would appear, then, that all the judges in the Court of Exchequer treated the case of\u00a0Dunlop v Higgins\u00a0as one decided upon its special circumstances, and as not enunciating any general principle beyond what was necessary for dealing with such circumstances.\u00a0\u201c p.231<\/p><div id=\"caree-2833999559\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Editor\u2019s notes:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This case brought contract law the \u2018postal rule\u2019 still in acceptance and use today. As a staple of contract law, it seems somewhat outdated and unmodernised through case law and the questions should be asked how fair or relevant it is today.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Key takeaway: Facts of the Case: Issues in Household Fire Insurance v Grant&nbsp;1879 4 EX D 216 Held by Court of Appeal Baggallay and Thesiger, L.JJ., Bramwell, L.J., dissenting \u201cIt seems to me that the correct way to deal with those expressions is to refer them to the subject-matter, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-14078","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 concerning company law, the appellant appealed against a decision finding him to be a shareholder in the respondent\u2019s company.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 concerning company law, the appellant appealed against a decision finding him to be a shareholder in the respondent\u2019s company.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-07T21:52:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:44:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T21:52:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216\"},\"wordCount\":476,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T21:52:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:56+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 concerning company law, the appellant appealed against a decision finding him to be a shareholder in the respondent\u2019s company.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 concerning company law, the appellant appealed against a decision finding him to be a shareholder in the respondent\u2019s company.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216","og_description":"In the case of Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 concerning company law, the appellant appealed against a decision finding him to be a shareholder in the respondent\u2019s company.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-07T21:52:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:44:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216","datePublished":"2023-07-07T21:52:27+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216"},"wordCount":476,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216","name":"Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-07T21:52:27+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:56+00:00","description":"In the case of Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216 concerning company law, the appellant appealed against a decision finding him to be a shareholder in the respondent\u2019s company.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-household-fire-insurance-v-grant-1879-4-ex-d-216#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Household Fire Insurance v Grant 1879 4 EX D 216"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14078","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14078"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14078\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14078"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14078"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14078"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}