{"id":14054,"date":"2023-07-07T19:57:36","date_gmt":"2023-07-07T19:57:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=14054"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:44:54","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:44:54","slug":"case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71, it was found that for a regular custom created through a course of dealings, to be incorporated as a term of the contract, must be a regular dealing.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A course of dealings must be substantial in order for oral agreements to incorporate conditions from a normal course of dealings.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>C had his car repaired at D\u2019s garage on three or four occasioned over a period of five years.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>On at least two of the occasions, he had signed a form having not read the printed words \u201cthe company is not responsible for damage caused by fire to customer\u2019s cards on the premises\u201d.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>By oral agreement made between C and D, D agreed to repair his car.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whilst at the premises, the car was damaged by a fire caused by D\u2019s negligence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C claimed for damages for the breach of the implied term that D would take reasonable care of his car.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>D relied on the condition excluding responsibility for the damage to cars caused by fire which they contented was incorporated into the oral agreement because of the previous course of dealings with the parties.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The judge at first instance held that the condition was incorporated into the contract and excluded D\u2019s liability for negligence and dismissed the claim.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C appealed<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Could &nbsp; D rely on the written condition of the contract to exclude their liability for negligence of &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; C\u2019s car.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by Court of Appeal<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Appeal allowed<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Latley J<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>It was found that as there was no sufficient course of dealing, the condition relied on could not be incorporated into the oral contract to exempt D from their own negligence and in any event, the language of the condition was not so plain that it clearly excluded liability for their negligence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>D was liable to C<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u201cIn each case one has to look at the words which are claimed to exempt. When in fact A can be liable in negligence only, the law, I believe, is that that fact, to employ the words of Scrutton L.J. in <em>Rutter <\/em>v. <em>Palmer <\/em>[1922] 2 K.B. 87, 92, &#8221; will more readily operate to exempt him.&#8221; But the law goes no further than that.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In saying that, I want to add that I wholly and emphatically agree with what Salmon L.J., has said in his judgment when dealing with <em>Rutter <\/em>v. <em>Palmer <\/em>and <em>Alderslade <\/em>v. <em>Hertdon Laundry Ltd. <\/em>[1945] 1 K.B. 189, when referring to the passage in Lord Greene M.R.&#8217;s judgment in the latter case, and with what he has said about <em>Turner <\/em>v. <em>Civil Service Supply Association Ltd. <\/em>[1926] 1 K.B. 50 and <em>Fagan <\/em>v. <em>Green &amp; Edwards Ltd. <\/em>[1926] 1 K.B. 102. In the sense I have mentioned and to that limited extent, in this case the defendants are entitled to pray in aid that as bailees they could only be liable in negligence and, therefore, that the court should more readily read these words as sufficient words of exemption. I approach the words in question with that in, mind and, doing so, to my mind these words would not convey to many intelligent laymen that the garage is saying: &#8221; If your car is damaged by fire we shall not be liable, and this is so even though it is due to our own fault that the fire happens.&#8221; In my opinion, other and plainer words are required. I therefore agree that on both grounds this appeal should be allowed.\u201d P84 A-D<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues in Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71 Held by Court of Appeal Latley J<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-14054","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71, it was found that for a regular custom created through a course of dealings, to be incorporated as a term of the contract, must be a regular dealing.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71, it was found that for a regular custom created through a course of dealings, to be incorporated as a term of the contract, must be a regular dealing.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-07T19:57:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T19:57:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71\"},\"wordCount\":617,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T19:57:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71, it was found that for a regular custom created through a course of dealings, to be incorporated as a term of the contract, must be a regular dealing.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71, it was found that for a regular custom created through a course of dealings, to be incorporated as a term of the contract, must be a regular dealing.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71","og_description":"In the case of Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71, it was found that for a regular custom created through a course of dealings, to be incorporated as a term of the contract, must be a regular dealing.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-07T19:57:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71","datePublished":"2023-07-07T19:57:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71"},"wordCount":617,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71","name":"Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-07T19:57:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00","description":"In the case of Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71, it was found that for a regular custom created through a course of dealings, to be incorporated as a term of the contract, must be a regular dealing.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hollier-v-rambler-motors-amc-ltd-1972-2-qb-71#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Hollier v Rambler Motors AMC Ltd 1972 2 QB 71"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14054"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14054\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}