{"id":14044,"date":"2023-07-07T19:50:28","date_gmt":"2023-07-07T19:50:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=14044"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:44:54","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:44:54","slug":"case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 it was held that the United Kingdom\u2019s ban on prisoners voting violated Art.3.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The applicant (H), a prisoner serving a discretionary life sentence for manslaughter, complained that the disenfranchisement of those serving the custodial sentence under the Representation of the People Act 1983 s.3 was contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 Protocol 1 Art.3.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The United Kingdom argued that the right to vote enshrined in Protocol 1 Art 3 was to absolute and that states had a wide margin or appreciation in determining such matters.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Section 3 disenfranchised those serving custodial sentences because they had not shown themselves capable of responsible citizenship.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It was further contended that other states imposed blanket banks, some going further than that provided for under the Act.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>H argued that the ability to vote was a right and not a privilege and that the ban removing that right did not pursue a legitimate aim.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Could the United Kingdom ban the right to vote of prisoners?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Appeal allowed<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Banning the right to vote breached Art.3<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Judge Wildhaber<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Held that although Protocol 1 Art.3 was capable of wide application, it was well established that it enshrined the rights of an individual to take part in free elections by being entitled to vote.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cWhilst the margin of appreciation was wide, there was no evidence that the UK legislature had assessed the proportionality of the ban in light of modern penal policy and current human rights standards.\u201d: [78]\u2013[79]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cTherefore, while the Court reiterates that the margin of appreciation is wide, it is not all-embracing\u2026Such a general, automatic and indiscriminate restriction on a vitally important Convention right fell outside the margin of appreciation.\u201d: [82]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues in Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 Held by European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) Judge Wildhaber<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-14044","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 it was held that the United Kingdom\u2019s ban on prisoners voting violated Art.3.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 it was held that the United Kingdom\u2019s ban on prisoners voting violated Art.3.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-07T19:50:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T19:50:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681\"},\"wordCount\":314,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T19:50:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 it was held that the United Kingdom\u2019s ban on prisoners voting violated Art.3.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 it was held that the United Kingdom\u2019s ban on prisoners voting violated Art.3.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681","og_description":"In the case of Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 it was held that the United Kingdom\u2019s ban on prisoners voting violated Art.3.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-07T19:50:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681","datePublished":"2023-07-07T19:50:28+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681"},"wordCount":314,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681","name":"Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-07T19:50:28+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:54+00:00","description":"In the case of Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681 it was held that the United Kingdom\u2019s ban on prisoners voting violated Art.3.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hirst-v-united-kingdom-no-2-74025-01-2005-echr-681#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Hirst v United Kingdom no 2 74025 01 2005 ECHR 681"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14044","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14044"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14044\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}