{"id":14032,"date":"2023-07-07T19:41:07","date_gmt":"2023-07-07T19:41:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=14032"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:44:48","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:44:48","slug":"case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877, a distinguishment was made between the duty owed to a trespasser and a visitor; a trespasser is owed such duty that the occupier takes steps of common sense\/humanity to reduce or avert danger by practicable means of warnings<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Ds owned electrified rail tracks, which were fenced off from a meadow, where children played<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>By 1965, the there was a breach in the fencing and people would commonly go through it and pass through the tracks as this was a shortcut<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The station master on behalf of D was notified in the same year that children were observed to have been playing on the tracks, but the fence remained unrepaired afterwards<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Later in the year, C (aged 6) trespassed via the broken fence and was injured on the live rail<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C\u2019s mother brought an action for negligence; held at the trial that Ds were negligent due to their failure to repair the fence for a prolonged period of time; the Court of Appeal held that Ds were reckless as to safeguarding C<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Appeal from the Court of Appeal for damages due to a breach of statutory duty<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the House of Lords<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Appeal dismissed \u2013 Ds were in breach of their common duty of care to trespassers, so C was entitled to damages; unanimous dismissal of the appeal, the verdicts and commentary of two of the Lords are inserted below<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Lord Reid<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Dismissed the appeal as it was too reckless by a big corporation to ignore the obvious danger of minors trespassing and exposing themselves to danger<\/p><div id=\"caree-1163250510\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u2018So it appears to me that an occupier&#8217;s duty to trespassers must vary according to his knowledge. ability and resources. It has often been said that trespassers must take the land as they find it. I would rather say that they must take the occupier as they find him.\u2019 [at p.899]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u2018It would have been very easy for them to have and enforce a reasonable system of inspection and repair of their boundary fence. They knew that children were entitled and accustomed to play on the other side of the fence and must have known, had any of their officers given the matter a thought, that a young child might easily cross a defective fence and run into grave danger. Yet they did nothing. I do not think that a large organisation is acting with due regard to humane consideration if its officers do not pay more attention to safety.\u2019 [at p.899]&nbsp;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Lord Morris of Borth-Y-Guest<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Dismissed the appeal because D\u2019s knowledge should have been factored in to take reasonable care to avoid the risk of a child trespasser being killed or injured by reason of the wheel being suddenly and blindly put to work<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u2018I think that the&nbsp;<a><\/a><a><\/a>railways&nbsp;<a><\/a><a><\/a>board&nbsp;would see that in the circumstances of this case there was a likelihood that some child might pass over the broken down fence and get on to the track with its live rail and be in peril of serious injury\u2019 [at p.907]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In my view, while it cannot be said that the&nbsp;<a><\/a><a><\/a>railways&nbsp;<a><\/a><a><\/a>board&nbsp;owed a common duty of care to the young boy in the present case they did owe to him at least the duty of acting with common humanity towards him.\u2019 [at p.909]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues in Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877 Held by the House of Lords Lord Reid Dismissed the appeal as it was too reckless by a big corporation to ignore the obvious danger of minors trespassing and exposing themselves to danger Lord Morris of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-14032","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877, a distinguishment was made between the duty owed to a trespasser and a visitor; a trespasser is owed such duty that the occupier takes steps of common sense\/humanity to reduce or avert danger by practicable means of warnings\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877, a distinguishment was made between the duty owed to a trespasser and a visitor; a trespasser is owed such duty that the occupier takes steps of common sense\/humanity to reduce or avert danger by practicable means of warnings\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-07T19:41:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:44:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T19:41:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877\"},\"wordCount\":587,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T19:41:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:48+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877, a distinguishment was made between the duty owed to a trespasser and a visitor; a trespasser is owed such duty that the occupier takes steps of common sense\\\/humanity to reduce or avert danger by practicable means of warnings\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877, a distinguishment was made between the duty owed to a trespasser and a visitor; a trespasser is owed such duty that the occupier takes steps of common sense\/humanity to reduce or avert danger by practicable means of warnings","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877","og_description":"In the case of Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877, a distinguishment was made between the duty owed to a trespasser and a visitor; a trespasser is owed such duty that the occupier takes steps of common sense\/humanity to reduce or avert danger by practicable means of warnings","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-07T19:41:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:44:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877","datePublished":"2023-07-07T19:41:07+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877"},"wordCount":587,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877","name":"Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-07T19:41:07+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:48+00:00","description":"In the case of Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877, a distinguishment was made between the duty owed to a trespasser and a visitor; a trespasser is owed such duty that the occupier takes steps of common sense\/humanity to reduce or avert danger by practicable means of warnings","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-herrington-v-british-railways-board-1972-ac-877#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Herrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14032"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14032\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}