{"id":14004,"date":"2023-07-07T18:59:23","date_gmt":"2023-07-07T18:59:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=14004"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:44:40","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:44:40","slug":"case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18, a nightclub was vicariously liable for the acts of a doorman who was supplied to it under an agreement for the provision of security services since the club had control not only over what the doorman did but also over how he was to do it.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>An assault by the doorman on a member of public caused an accidental bodily injury for the purposes of the employer\u2019s public liability insurance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>L and F, (the appellants) appealed against a decision that a doorman supplied to a nightclub was deemed to be a temporary employee of the nightclub or the purposes of vicarious liability.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>L operated a nightclub and contracted with a supplier (S) for the provision of security services including doormen.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A doorman (W) supplied to the club under that agreement assaulted a member of public (C) and was later convicted of grievous bodily harm.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C sued D and W\u2019s employer and L as his \u201ctemporary deemed employer\u201d.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C claimed that S and L were liable for W\u2019s tortious act.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>S had gone into liquidation and C obtained a judgment in default against it.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>S was covered by insurance issued by F but F refused to indemnify S.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The judge at first instance held that L was vicariously liable because they had sufficient control over W to make him a temporary deemed employee.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>He also found that C\u2019s bodily injury was \u201caccidental\u201d within the meaning of F\u2019s policy even though W had deliberately punched C intending to do him serious harm.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The judge gave judgment against L and declared F was liable to indemnify S.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The judge assessed S\u2019s contribution under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 nil.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>L submitted that the judge had been wrong to find that W was a temporary employee fo L and that he had been wrong to find a nil contribution against S.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Did vicarious liability include no fault on the part of the employer?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Was the first or second defendant vicariously liable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by Court of Appeal<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Appeal dismissed<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Hallett LJ<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The appeal was dismissed vicarious liability required no fault on the part of the employer or in the instance case the deemed employer.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe burden of showing that responsibility does not remain with the general employer is on the general employer and is a heavy on\u201d [28]<\/p><div id=\"caree-3816303048\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe extent to which an organisation can control another&#8217;s employee will obviously be relevant to the question of how much the employee has become embedded in that organisation. Every case is fact specific and many factors may be relevant. The question of control may not be wholly determinative, but, for as long as <em>Mersey Docks <\/em>remains the authoritative decision on when responsibility for an employee&#8217;s tortious acts may pass from a general employer to a &#8220;temporary deemed employer&#8221;, the question of control remains at the heart of the test to be applied.\u201d [82]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues in Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18 Held by Court of Appeal Hallett LJ \u201cThe burden of showing that responsibility does not remain with the general employer is on the general employer and is a heavy on\u201d [28] \u201cThe extent to which an organisation [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-14004","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18, a nightclub was vicariously liable for the acts of a doorman who was supplied to it under an agreement for the provision of security services since the club had control not only over what the doorman did but also over how he was to do it.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18, a nightclub was vicariously liable for the acts of a doorman who was supplied to it under an agreement for the provision of security services since the club had control not only over what the doorman did but also over how he was to do it.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-07T18:59:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:44:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T18:59:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18\"},\"wordCount\":514,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T18:59:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18, a nightclub was vicariously liable for the acts of a doorman who was supplied to it under an agreement for the provision of security services since the club had control not only over what the doorman did but also over how he was to do it.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18, a nightclub was vicariously liable for the acts of a doorman who was supplied to it under an agreement for the provision of security services since the club had control not only over what the doorman did but also over how he was to do it.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18","og_description":"In the case of Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18, a nightclub was vicariously liable for the acts of a doorman who was supplied to it under an agreement for the provision of security services since the club had control not only over what the doorman did but also over how he was to do it.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-07T18:59:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:44:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18","datePublished":"2023-07-07T18:59:23+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18"},"wordCount":514,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18","name":"Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-07T18:59:23+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:40+00:00","description":"In the case of Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18, a nightclub was vicariously liable for the acts of a doorman who was supplied to it under an agreement for the provision of security services since the club had control not only over what the doorman did but also over how he was to do it.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-hawley-v-luminar-2006-ewca-civ-18#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Hawley v Luminar 2006 EWCA civ 18"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14004","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14004"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14004\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14004"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14004"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14004"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}