{"id":13992,"date":"2023-07-07T18:51:02","date_gmt":"2023-07-07T18:51:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=13992"},"modified":"2024-05-02T20:35:24","modified_gmt":"2024-05-03T00:35:24","slug":"case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>In the case of Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 it was found that the confiscation of a book deemed to be obscene did not violate the right to freedom of expression.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>The applicant, an English Publisher, was charged and convicted under the Obscene Publications Act 1959 and 1964 for \u2018having in his possession obscene books entitled The Little Red Schoolbook for publication for gain\u2019.<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>Copies of the book were later seized and destroyed (including the book\u2019s matrix).<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>The applicant was ordered to pay costs and a fine of \u00a350.<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>The book was published circulated in Europe and parts of the United Kingdom without prosecution.<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>After, the applicant published s revised edition of the Schoolbook and there were no further criminal proceedings.<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>The applicant alleged breaches of Articles 1,7,9,10,13 and 14 of the Convention and of Article 1 of .Protocol No.1 The Commission declared admissible the complaints under Article 10 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.1. it also decided ex officio to consider Articles 17 and 18 of the convention.<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>The remaining complaints were declared to be inadmissible.<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>The Commission by a majority concluded that there had been no breach of Article 10 or of Article 1 of Protocol No.1. it referred the case to the Court.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in<\/strong> <strong>Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751<\/strong><\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>Was there a breach of freedom of speech against the appellant?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by European Court of Human Rights<\/strong><\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>Appeal dismissed with no breach of Article 10 established.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Judgment<\/strong><\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>Held by the plenary Court, by 13 votes to 1, that the interference with the applicant\u2019s freedom of expression was \u2018prescribed by law\u2019 and \u2018necessary in a democratic society\u2026 for the protection of morals\u2019 under Article 10(2).<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>There had been no violation of Article 10.<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>It was also held unanimously that there had been no breach of Articles 14 and 18 of the convention or of Article 1 of Protocol No.1.<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>\u201c\u2026whilst the adjective \u2018necessary\u2019, within the meaning of Article 10(2), is not synonymous with \u2018indispensable\u2019, neither has it the flexibility of such expressions as \u2018admissible\u2019, \u2018ordinary\u2019, \u2018useful\u2019, \u2018reasonable\u2019, or \u2018desirable\u2019.\u201d Pg.48<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The domestic \u2018margin of appreciation\u2019 went hand in hand with a \u2018European supervision\u2019.\u2026Freedom of expression constituted one of the essential foundations of a \u2018democratic society. Subject to Article 10 (2), it applied to information which caused offence or shock. Any restriction of freedom of expression had to be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued\u201d:\u00a0 pg.49<\/p><div id=\"caree-3031182200\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues in Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 Held by European Court of Human Rights Judgment The domestic \u2018margin of appreciation\u2019 went hand in hand with a \u2018European supervision\u2019.\u2026Freedom of expression constituted one of the essential foundations of a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13992","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.7) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 it was found that the confiscation of a book deemed to be obscene did not violate the right to freedom of expression.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 it was found that the confiscation of a book deemed to be obscene did not violate the right to freedom of expression.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-07T18:51:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-03T00:35:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T18:51:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-03T00:35:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751\"},\"wordCount\":403,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-07T18:51:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-03T00:35:24+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 it was found that the confiscation of a book deemed to be obscene did not violate the right to freedom of expression.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 it was found that the confiscation of a book deemed to be obscene did not violate the right to freedom of expression.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751","og_description":"In the case of Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 it was found that the confiscation of a book deemed to be obscene did not violate the right to freedom of expression.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-07T18:51:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-03T00:35:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751","datePublished":"2023-07-07T18:51:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-03T00:35:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751"},"wordCount":403,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751","name":"Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-07T18:51:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-03T00:35:24+00:00","description":"In the case of Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751 it was found that the confiscation of a book deemed to be obscene did not violate the right to freedom of expression.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-handyside-v-united-kingdom-1976-echr-5-1976-1-ehrr-737-at-751#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Handyside v United Kingdom 1976 ECHR 5 [1976] 1 EHRR 737 at 751"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13992","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13992"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13992\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}