{"id":13910,"date":"2023-07-06T01:23:46","date_gmt":"2023-07-06T01:23:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=13910"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:44:16","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:44:16","slug":"case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 the principles established in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 are rejected in favour of allowing an order for occupational rent to a trustee in bankruptcy to be granted based upon the court equitable jurisdiction outside the Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustee Act 1996 (TLATA).\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A couple lived in a property for which they were registered proprietors of their home. The husband was later declared bankrupt, but the couple continued to live on the property.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>This was until the husband\u2019s trustee, Mr. French, on December 14, 2006, applied for a court order to sell the property under s14 of the Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustee Act 1996.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The trustee in the husband\u2019s bankruptcy, the claimant in this case, Mr. French, was entitled to occupation rent from the wife, the defendant here.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The wife argued the court had no power to grant the claimant&#8217;s compensation because he did not hold a beneficiary title that would entitle him to possession. Therefore, Mr. French, the claimant was not eligible under s13 TLATA.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the High Court<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Occupation rent was ordered on behalf of the claimant.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Justice Blackburne<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>When occupation rent is to be granted:<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>It would be unreasonable for the co-owner to occupy the premises based on the circumstances, i.e. identity and relationship to the co-owner(s).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Occupation rent cannot be claimed if it is reasonable for the co-owner to occupy but he chooses not to.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Occupation rent should ordinarily be granted to a trustee in bankruptcy because it is unreasonable for the trustee to claim the right to occupy unless it\u2019s shown that there was an understanding that no occupation rent will be charged or the co-owner occupying the property had no reasonable means of discovering that the other co-owner was bankrupt.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues in French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 Held by the High Court Justice Blackburne<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13910","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 the principles established in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 are rejected in favour of allowing an order for occupational rent to a trustee in bankruptcy to be granted based upon the court equitable jurisdiction outside the Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustee Act 1996 (TLATA).\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 the principles established in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 are rejected in favour of allowing an order for occupational rent to a trustee in bankruptcy to be granted based upon the court equitable jurisdiction outside the Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustee Act 1996 (TLATA).\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-06T01:23:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:44:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-06T01:23:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124\"},\"wordCount\":323,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-06T01:23:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:16+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 the principles established in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 are rejected in favour of allowing an order for occupational rent to a trustee in bankruptcy to be granted based upon the court equitable jurisdiction outside the Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustee Act 1996 (TLATA).\u00a0\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 the principles established in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 are rejected in favour of allowing an order for occupational rent to a trustee in bankruptcy to be granted based upon the court equitable jurisdiction outside the Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustee Act 1996 (TLATA).\u00a0","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124","og_description":"In the case of French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 the principles established in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 are rejected in favour of allowing an order for occupational rent to a trustee in bankruptcy to be granted based upon the court equitable jurisdiction outside the Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustee Act 1996 (TLATA).\u00a0","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-06T01:23:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:44:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124","datePublished":"2023-07-06T01:23:46+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124"},"wordCount":323,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124","name":"Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-06T01:23:46+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:16+00:00","description":"In the case of French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124 the principles established in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 are rejected in favour of allowing an order for occupational rent to a trustee in bankruptcy to be granted based upon the court equitable jurisdiction outside the Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustee Act 1996 (TLATA).\u00a0","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-french-v-barcham-2008-2-wlr-1124#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: French v Barcham [2008] 2 wlr 1124"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13910"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13910\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}