{"id":13584,"date":"2023-07-04T00:49:37","date_gmt":"2023-07-04T00:49:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=13584"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:46:01","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:46:01","slug":"case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-points\"><strong>Legal principles and points:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In <em>McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82<\/em>it was held that Secret trusts are only enabled to circumvent the legitimacy of a will under the Wills Act, when there is evidence that a fraud had occurred, or was likely to occur, on the basis that equity will not allow a statute as an instrument of fraud.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the case:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>S left his estate to T in his will, whom he later gave a letter containing instructions relating to the distribution of the property.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The letter disclosed the names of S\u2019s relatives and friends, however, instructed T to exercise \u2018good judgement\u2019 in distributing the estate in a way that S would have done.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>One of the beneficiaries of the will did not get anything, submitted that there was a secret trust, and that T was in breach of that trust.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in <em>McCormick v Grogan [1869]:<\/em><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The issue in this case was whether there was indeed a secret trust, or whether the parties are bound by the division of the properties in the way that T did.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The House of Lords held:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The HL held that there was no secret trust on the facts. The presence of a secret trust, so as to circumvent the legitimacy of a will under the Wills Act, is only able to be determined where evidence has been adduced suggesting that fraud had occurred, or was likely to occur with respect to the will.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>S had not therefore intended to create a trust on T, but rather, merely intended to act \u2018as a guide to T\u2019<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Lord Hatherly:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u201cAn Act of Parliament shall not be used as an instrument of fraud, but this doctrine must be restricted to clear cases of fraud since it deviates from the policy of Parliament in enacting the statute of frauds\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201c<\/strong>In the current case, the intention of the testator was that his instructions were simply to act as a guide to T and not to impose a trust\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u201cWhen you look at this instrument, and see the mode in which it is framed in its several parts, beginning with something which certainly looks like express gifts, and then qualifying those gifts in the very extraordinary manner in which he does quality them afterwards, I think the letter itself, and all the circumstances attending it, lead to the conclusion that it was the full intention of the testator, uninduced by anything except that it was his own wish so to deal with his property, to give Mr. Grogan full and complete control over the property, and to leave the instructions simply as a guide which might assist him in the discretion which he would himself exercise.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u201cbut it is absolutely necessary that it should be so, because it is a case where a right of property is claimed, and is sought to be enforced through the medium of fastening an imputation of fraud, for which there is no justification.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal principles and points: Facts of the case: Issues in McCormick v Grogan [1869]: The House of Lords held: Lord Hatherly:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13584","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82it was held that Secret trusts are only enabled to circumvent the legitimacy of a will under the Wills Act, when there is evidence that a fraud had occurred, or was likely to occur, on the basis that equity will not allow a statute as an instrument of fraud.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82it was held that Secret trusts are only enabled to circumvent the legitimacy of a will under the Wills Act, when there is evidence that a fraud had occurred, or was likely to occur, on the basis that equity will not allow a statute as an instrument of fraud.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-04T00:49:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:46:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-04T00:49:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:46:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82\"},\"wordCount\":499,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-04T00:49:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:46:01+00:00\",\"description\":\"In McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82it was held that Secret trusts are only enabled to circumvent the legitimacy of a will under the Wills Act, when there is evidence that a fraud had occurred, or was likely to occur, on the basis that equity will not allow a statute as an instrument of fraud.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82it was held that Secret trusts are only enabled to circumvent the legitimacy of a will under the Wills Act, when there is evidence that a fraud had occurred, or was likely to occur, on the basis that equity will not allow a statute as an instrument of fraud.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82","og_description":"In McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82it was held that Secret trusts are only enabled to circumvent the legitimacy of a will under the Wills Act, when there is evidence that a fraud had occurred, or was likely to occur, on the basis that equity will not allow a statute as an instrument of fraud.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-04T00:49:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:46:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82","datePublished":"2023-07-04T00:49:37+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:46:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82"},"wordCount":499,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82","name":"Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-04T00:49:37+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:46:01+00:00","description":"In McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82it was held that Secret trusts are only enabled to circumvent the legitimacy of a will under the Wills Act, when there is evidence that a fraud had occurred, or was likely to occur, on the basis that equity will not allow a statute as an instrument of fraud.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-mccormick-v-grogan-1869-lr-4-hl-82#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: McCormick v Grogan [1869] LR 4 HL 82"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13584\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}