{"id":13558,"date":"2023-07-03T20:53:22","date_gmt":"2023-07-03T20:53:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=13558"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:44:38","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:44:38","slug":"case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-points\"><strong>Legal principles and points:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In <em>Habberfield v Habberfield, <\/em>the Court of Appeal overruled the decision in <em>Suggitt v Suggitt [2012, <\/em>and held that in a successful proprietary estoppel claim, the relief granted must be proportionate to the detriment which the party seeking to rely on the doctrine suffered.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>C\u2019s parents owned a farm. C\u2019s parents promised her that she would take ownership of a part of the farm when her father retired, and that she would inherit the farm in its entirety on the death of both parents.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>C worked on this farm in reliance on the assurance which her parents made.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Some time after the promises were made to C, her parents removed her from their inheritance following a breakdown in her and her parents\u2019 relationship. Her parents did offer a settlement with C, though C refused.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>When C\u2019s father died, C sought to sue her mother, D, for the property on the basis of proprietary estoppel.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The trial judge found that she had a successful claim, and awarded her \u00a31,170,000, because she relied to her detriment in the assurances made to her.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues for the Court of Appeal in <em>Habberfield v Habberfield<\/em><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>D appealed, on the grounds that, inter alia, (i) C\u2019s refusal of the settlement acted as a bar to her proprietary estoppel claim and (ii) the judge\u2019s award was disproportionate to the detriment C suffered.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>CA held:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Her refusal to accept her parents\u2019 settlement offer did not prevent her from rely on proprietary estoppel.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Relief in a proprietary estoppel claim is to be quantified in terms of its proportionality with the detriment. Proportionality is not a question calculable by maths alone; there is a flexible degree judgmental discretion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>C\u2019s detriment in this case was \u00a3220,000, yet she was awarded \u00a31,170,000- but- there were unquantifiable detriments too. C had spent three decades at the farm, something which was not susceptible to quantification.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Lord Justice Lewison:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>On the refusal to accept the settlement: [37] \u201cThe decision to stop dairy farming in 2015 was nothing to do with Lucy, and she should not be penalised by any reduction in the value of her equity in consequence of that decision.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>On the issue of proportionality: [58] \u201cIn my judgment the question that Arden LJ posed at the end of that paragraph is the correct question. The relevant comparison for the purposes of proportionality is a comparison between detriment and remedy. Nevertheless, proportionality is not a question of mathematical precision. Like all cases in which the court decides how to satisfy an equity, it must exercise a judgmental discretion, and may do so in a flexible way.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>[61] \u201cTo some extent, this part of the appeal raises the unsolved question: what is the objective that the court pursues in deciding how to satisfy an equity of this kind?\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>[71] \u201dIt follows that the expectation is not determinative of the relief to be granted. Accordingly, the judge was also right to consider whether that expectation interest should be scaled down.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal principles and points: Facts of the case Issues for the Court of Appeal in Habberfield v Habberfield CA held: Lord Justice Lewison:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13558","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In Habberfield v Habberfield, the Court of Appeal overruled the decision in Suggitt v Suggitt [2012, and held that in a successful proprietary estoppel claim, the relief granted must be proportionate to the detriment which the party seeking to rely on the doctrine suffered.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Habberfield v Habberfield, the Court of Appeal overruled the decision in Suggitt v Suggitt [2012, and held that in a successful proprietary estoppel claim, the relief granted must be proportionate to the detriment which the party seeking to rely on the doctrine suffered.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-03T20:53:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:44:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-03T20:53:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890\"},\"wordCount\":507,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-03T20:53:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:44:38+00:00\",\"description\":\"In Habberfield v Habberfield, the Court of Appeal overruled the decision in Suggitt v Suggitt [2012, and held that in a successful proprietary estoppel claim, the relief granted must be proportionate to the detriment which the party seeking to rely on the doctrine suffered.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In Habberfield v Habberfield, the Court of Appeal overruled the decision in Suggitt v Suggitt [2012, and held that in a successful proprietary estoppel claim, the relief granted must be proportionate to the detriment which the party seeking to rely on the doctrine suffered.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890","og_description":"In Habberfield v Habberfield, the Court of Appeal overruled the decision in Suggitt v Suggitt [2012, and held that in a successful proprietary estoppel claim, the relief granted must be proportionate to the detriment which the party seeking to rely on the doctrine suffered.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-03T20:53:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:44:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890","datePublished":"2023-07-03T20:53:22+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890"},"wordCount":507,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890","name":"Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-03T20:53:22+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:44:38+00:00","description":"In Habberfield v Habberfield, the Court of Appeal overruled the decision in Suggitt v Suggitt [2012, and held that in a successful proprietary estoppel claim, the relief granted must be proportionate to the detriment which the party seeking to rely on the doctrine suffered.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-habberfield-v-habberfield-2019-ewca-civ-890#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13558\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}