{"id":13542,"date":"2023-07-03T20:44:25","date_gmt":"2023-07-03T20:44:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=13542"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:37:51","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:37:51","slug":"case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-points\"><strong>Legal principles and points:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In <em>Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], <\/em>the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) determined that a prohibition of laser tag (or the setting up of a \u2018laserdrome\u2019) was justified and thus not contrary to Community law.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The applicant company, Omega, were served a notice prohibiting them from setting up a \u2018laserdrome\u2019 by the authorities in Germany.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>At the proposed laserdrome, customers would play \u2018laser tag\u2019, whereby they would target each other with lasers which looked like guns. The German authorities prohibited this, on the basis that it was contrary to public policy, and moreover the German Federal Administrative Court held that banning the game was compatible with the German \u2018Basic Law\u2019 article 1 (1) on \u2018human dignity\u2019.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The national court referred the issue to the CJEU to determine whether this was an impingement to the free movement of services and thus in contravention of Article 56 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in <em>Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004]:<\/em><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The fundamental issue in the case was whether European Community law precluded Member States from prohibiting games which simulated acts of homicide on grounds of protecting public policy<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the CJEU:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Community law does not preclude an economic activity consisting of games simulating acts of homicide from being prohibited by Member States on the grounds of protecting public policy and more specifically human dignity, however, in order to rely on such an argument, there needs to be no less intrusive measures able to be used.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The CJEU also held that Community law will ensure that individual Member States have a margin for discretion when it comes to public policy, as inevitably each Member State will have different values and ideas of public policy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The CJEU specifically stated:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>[34] \u201cThe Community legal order undeniably strives to ensure respect for human dignity as a general principle of law. There can therefore be no doubt that the objective of protecting human dignity is compatible with Community law, it being immaterial in that respect that, in Germany, the principle of respect for human dignity has a particular status as an independent fundamental right\u201d [I-9653]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>[35] \u201cSince the Community and Member States are required to respect fundamental rights, the protection of those rights is a legitimate interest which, in principle, justifies a restriction of the obligations imposed by Community law, even under fundamental freedom guaranteed by the treaty, such as the freedom to provide services and goods\u201d [I-9653]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>[36] \u201cHowever, measures which restrict the freedom to provide services may be justified on public policy grounds only if they are necessary for the protection of the interests which they are intended to guarantee\u2026 and only insofar as those objectives cannot be attained by less restrictive measures\u201d [I-9653]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal principles and points: Facts of the case Issues in Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004]: Held by the CJEU: The CJEU specifically stated:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13542","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) determined that a prohibition of laser tag (or the setting up of a \u2018laserdrome\u2019) was justified and thus not contrary to Community law.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) determined that a prohibition of laser tag (or the setting up of a \u2018laserdrome\u2019) was justified and thus not contrary to Community law.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-03T20:44:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:37:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Case C-36\\\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-03T20:44:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:37:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609\"},\"wordCount\":463,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Case C-36\\\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-03T20:44:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:37:51+00:00\",\"description\":\"In Case C-36\\\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) determined that a prohibition of laser tag (or the setting up of a \u2018laserdrome\u2019) was justified and thus not contrary to Community law.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Case C-36\\\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) determined that a prohibition of laser tag (or the setting up of a \u2018laserdrome\u2019) was justified and thus not contrary to Community law.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609","og_description":"In Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) determined that a prohibition of laser tag (or the setting up of a \u2018laserdrome\u2019) was justified and thus not contrary to Community law.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-07-03T20:44:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:37:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609","datePublished":"2023-07-03T20:44:25+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:37:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609"},"wordCount":463,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609","name":"Case Summary: Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-03T20:44:25+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:37:51+00:00","description":"In Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) determined that a prohibition of laser tag (or the setting up of a \u2018laserdrome\u2019) was justified and thus not contrary to Community law.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-36-02-omega-spielhallen-2004-ecr-i-9609#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Case C-36\/02 Omega Spielhallen [2004], ECR I-9609"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13542"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13542\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}