{"id":13497,"date":"2023-06-29T01:13:19","date_gmt":"2023-06-29T01:13:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=13497"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:38:59","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:38:59","slug":"case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The case of Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu concerned employment law, it established that mandatory and unconditionally natured provisions of the Charter can be applied horizontally.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Shimizu was employed by Max-Planck and was told to take his leave before the employment relationship terminated \u2013 he took two days\u2019 leave<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>After unsuccessfully seeking payment from Max-Planck for the 51 days\u2019 paid annual leave, Shimizu brought an action seeking the employer be ordered to pay<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Max-Planck appealed the action being upheld<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The referring court, Federal Labour Court of Germany, believed that EU case law does not make it possible to determine whether national law is consistent with Article 7 of Council Directive 2003\/88, nor Article 31(2) of the Charter<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Labour Court were also unsure as to whether the Directive and Charter has direct effect in respect of conflict between individuals \u2013 they believed as the company as the company was a non-profit organisation without special powers it would be treated as an individual<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Did the national law preclude the right to annual paid leave under Article 31(2)?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>And did this Article have horizontal direct effect?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the European Court of Justice<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Article 31(2) not only precludes national measures, but is also applicable by horizontal direct effect.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Findings of the Court<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The European Court of Justice established that Article 31(2) precludes national legislation:<\/p><div id=\"caree-415803770\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u201cit should be recalled that it is settled case-law of the Court that the fundamental rights guaranteed in the legal order of the European Union are applicable in all situations governed by EU law\u201d [49]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The provision \u201censhrines the \u2018right\u2019 of all workers to an \u2018annual period of paid leave\u2019\u201d [51]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Applying this to the present case, the CJEU held \u201cMember States may not derogate from the principle flowing from Article 7 of Directive 2003\/88 read in the light of Article 31(2) of the Charter, that the right to paid annual leave acquired cannot be lost at the end of the leave year and\/or of a carry-over period fixed by national law, when the worker has been unable to take his leave\u201d [54]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Horizontal direct effect of the Charter must be applied, this will \u201censure within its jurisdiction the judicial protection for individuals flowing from that provision and to guarantee the full effectiveness thereof by disapplying if need be that national legislation\u201d [80]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu Issues in Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu Held by the European Court of Justice Findings of the Court The European Court of Justice established that Article 31(2) precludes national legislation: Applying this to the present case, the CJEU held [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13497","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The case of Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu concerned employment law, it established that mandatory and unconditionally natured provisions of the Charter can be applied horizontally.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The case of Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu concerned employment law, it established that mandatory and unconditionally natured provisions of the Charter can be applied horizontally.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-29T01:13:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:38:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Case C-684\\\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-29T01:13:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:38:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu\"},\"wordCount\":404,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Case C-684\\\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-29T01:13:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:38:59+00:00\",\"description\":\"The case of Case C-684\\\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu concerned employment law, it established that mandatory and unconditionally natured provisions of the Charter can be applied horizontally.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Case C-684\\\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"The case of Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu concerned employment law, it established that mandatory and unconditionally natured provisions of the Charter can be applied horizontally.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu","og_description":"The case of Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu concerned employment law, it established that mandatory and unconditionally natured provisions of the Charter can be applied horizontally.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-06-29T01:13:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:38:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu","datePublished":"2023-06-29T01:13:19+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:38:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu"},"wordCount":404,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu","name":"Case Summary: Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-06-29T01:13:19+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:38:59+00:00","description":"The case of Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu concerned employment law, it established that mandatory and unconditionally natured provisions of the Charter can be applied horizontally.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-684-16-max-planck-gesellschaft-v-shimizu#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Case C-684\/16 Max Planck Gesellschaft v Shimizu"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13497","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13497"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13497\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13497"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13497"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}