{"id":13485,"date":"2023-06-29T01:06:27","date_gmt":"2023-06-29T01:06:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=13485"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:38:32","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:38:32","slug":"case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The case of Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41, concerned Article 260 (now Article 263 TFEU) \u2013 what the European Court of Justice can review. This includes legislative acts, Council acts, etc. This case specifically established that the Court is able to review the validity of Community law that has not yet been implemented through requesting the national court to make preliminary reference to the CJEU.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>EU Directive 2001\/37\/EC was amended and extended the rules governing tar yields of cigarettes, and the warnings on tobacco products<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The legal basis being Article 95 EC \u2013 preventing the circumventing of internal market provisions of products exported to non-member countries &nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Cs, UK-based tobacco manufacturers British American Tobacco, contested the validity of the measure<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The European Commission and the French Government observed that such should be inadmissible due to:<ul><li>the proceedings for preliminary reference being made before implementation of the measure, and<\/li><\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>accepting admissibility for preliminary reference on the validity of the Directive would be as good as circumventing the requirements of Article 260 EC (now Article 263 TFEU)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Were the Commission and the French Government correct in their argument against accepting the preliminary reference as admissible?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the European Court of Justice<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>It was admissible. Individuals may plead the invalidity of Community law before national courts without the need of the measure\u2019s adoption into national law.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Findings of the Court<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>It need not matter if the matter concerned is directly applicable or not, \u201cUnder Article 234 EC the Court has jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning the validity and interpretation of acts of the Community institutions, regardless\u201d [32]<\/p><div id=\"caree-2899705525\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>In respect of the main proceedings possibly being \u201ctantamount to circumventing the requirements of Article 230 EC\u201d [39], the CJEU found:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Natural or legal persons should be able to indirectly plead the invalidity of measures under Article 241, or be able to request national courts to make preliminary reference to the CJEU when they cannot otherwise do so under the rules of admissibility under Article 230 [39]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, \u201cit is sufficient if the national court is called upon to hear a genuine dispute in which the question of the validity of such an act is raised indirectly\u201d without the measure being transposed and adopted by national law [40]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41 Issues in Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41 Held by the European Court of Justice Findings of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13485","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The case of Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41, concerned Article 260 (now Article 263 TFEU) \u2013 what the European Court of Justice can review.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The case of Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41, concerned Article 260 (now Article 263 TFEU) \u2013 what the European Court of Justice can review.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-29T01:06:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:38:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Case C-491\\\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-29T01:06:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:38:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41\"},\"wordCount\":435,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Case C-491\\\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-29T01:06:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:38:32+00:00\",\"description\":\"The case of Case C-491\\\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41, concerned Article 260 (now Article 263 TFEU) \u2013 what the European Court of Justice can review.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Case C-491\\\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"The case of Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41, concerned Article 260 (now Article 263 TFEU) \u2013 what the European Court of Justice can review.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41","og_description":"The case of Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41, concerned Article 260 (now Article 263 TFEU) \u2013 what the European Court of Justice can review.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-06-29T01:06:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:38:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41","datePublished":"2023-06-29T01:06:27+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:38:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41"},"wordCount":435,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41","name":"Case Summary: Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-06-29T01:06:27+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:38:32+00:00","description":"The case of Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41, concerned Article 260 (now Article 263 TFEU) \u2013 what the European Court of Justice can review.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-491-01-r-v-secretary-of-state-ex-parte-bat-and-imperial-tobacco-2002-ecr-i-11453-paras-28-41#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Case C-491\/01 R v. Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 28-41"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13485\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}