{"id":13360,"date":"2023-06-28T14:24:09","date_gmt":"2023-06-28T14:24:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=13360"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:35:55","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:35:55","slug":"case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331, public policy immunity was the card attempted to be used by D for D\u2019s failure to extinguish a fire in a building<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Capital Counties was one of several appellants, so the full case name is: Capital &amp; Counties PLC v Hampshire County Council; Digital Equipment Co Ltd v Same; John Munroe (Acrylics) Ltd v London Fire and Civil Defence Authority and Others; Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Great Britain) v West Yorkshire Fire and Civil Defence Authority<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A building caught fire and these premises were occupied by Capital Counties; the fire started at 10 am, the sprinklers turned on 23 minutes later, but were turned off at 10:50 am on the instruction of a fire fighter<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A key principle in fire-fighting is that sprinklers should not be turned off until it is ascertained that the fire has been completely extinguished<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The fire brigade located the seat of the fire at 11:10 am, but by 12:10, it was certain that the building had been totally succumbed to the fire<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>There was no concrete evidence about what would have happened on the balance of probabilities had the sprinklers been left on, but it was envisaged that three quarters of Block A and the whole of Blocks B and C from the building would have been saved \u2013 accordingly, failing to obstruct the fire resulted in \u00a316 million in damages<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Decision appealed to the Court of Appeal on the ground of public policy immunity<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) &nbsp;<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Appeal dismissed \u2013 there was no common law duty to answer help calls and the brigade did not enter proximity with the premises\u2019 occupier<strong><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Stuart-Smith, Potter and Judge LJJ<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The panel\u2019s judgement dismissed the appeal as the fire brigade\u2019s actions had worsened the fire, so were not entitled to public policy immunity, which in principle was not always meant to be enjoyed by public authorities<\/p><div id=\"caree-2706190744\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u2018We consider first, therefore, whether there is any reason of policy why the\u00a0Hampshire\u00a0Fire Authority should not be liable. The starting point is that \u201cthe public policy consideration which has first claim on the loyalty of the law is that wrongs should be remedied, and that very potent considerations are required to override that policy:\u201dper\u00a0Lord Browne-Wilkinson in\u00a0X (Minors) v. Bedfordshire County Council\u00a0[1995] 2 A.C. 633, 749.\u2019 [at p.353]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u2018But it is clear from the leading case of\u00a0<em>Hill v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire<\/em>\u00a0[1989] A.C. 53\u00a0that the police do not enjoy blanket immunity.\u2019 [at p.353]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u2018In our judgment there is no doubt on which side of the line a case such as the&nbsp;<a><\/a><a><\/a>Hampshire&nbsp;case falls. It is one where the defendants, by their action in turning off the sprinklers, created or increased the danger. There is no ground for giving immunity in such a case.\u2019 [at p.356]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues in Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331 Held by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) &nbsp; Stuart-Smith, Potter and Judge LJJ The panel\u2019s judgement dismissed the appeal as the fire brigade\u2019s actions had worsened the fire, so were not entitled to public [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13360","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.7) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331, public policy immunity was the card attempted to be used by D for D\u2019s failure to extinguish a fire in a building\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331, public policy immunity was the card attempted to be used by D for D\u2019s failure to extinguish a fire in a building\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-28T14:24:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:35:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-28T14:24:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:35:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331\"},\"wordCount\":500,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-28T14:24:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:35:55+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331, public policy immunity was the card attempted to be used by D for D\u2019s failure to extinguish a fire in a building\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331, public policy immunity was the card attempted to be used by D for D\u2019s failure to extinguish a fire in a building","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331","og_description":"In the case of Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331, public policy immunity was the card attempted to be used by D for D\u2019s failure to extinguish a fire in a building","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-06-28T14:24:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:35:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331","datePublished":"2023-06-28T14:24:09+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:35:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331"},"wordCount":500,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331","name":"Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-06-28T14:24:09+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:35:55+00:00","description":"In the case of Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331, public policy immunity was the card attempted to be used by D for D\u2019s failure to extinguish a fire in a building","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-capital-counties-v-hampshire-cc-1997-3-wlr-331#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Capital Counties v Hampshire CC [1997] 3 WLR 331"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13360","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13360"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13360\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}