{"id":13336,"date":"2024-05-02T04:05:40","date_gmt":"2024-05-02T08:05:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=13336"},"modified":"2024-05-02T20:24:53","modified_gmt":"2024-05-03T00:24:53","slug":"case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n<p>This analysis of <em>Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983]<\/em>, essential for law students, explores contract formation through instantaneous communication across international borders.<\/p><div id=\"caree-1799773533\" class=\"caree-within-the-content caree-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1.png 448w, https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/10\/MRF-169650-in-article-336x280-1-300x250.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" width=\"448\" height=\"373\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/div>\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points in Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel<\/strong><\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>In the case of Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34, contract formation was explored in the context of instantaneous communication and the presiding jurisdiction where the sellers were based in a different country.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34<\/strong><\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>The C buyers, Brinkibon Ltd, were a company based in London, England<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>The D sellers, Stahag Steel, were based in Vienna, Austria<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>The Cs had sent their acceptance to the Ds offer by telex communication<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>Later, the Cs wanted to sue the Ds for breach of contract<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>The High Court were unsure on the scope of their jurisdiction regarding a party residing outside of the country and the Court of Appeal believed it be outside the scope of English law, so the case was taken to the House of Lords<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues in Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34<\/strong><\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>A contract was made between the parties, but was this formed in England and so English law could deal with the alleged breach, or would Austrian law have to deal with it?<\/li>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<li>Having accepted using telex, when was the contract formed?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by the House of Lords<\/strong><\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>Appeal dismissed. The contract was formed in Austria where the acceptance was received \u2013 therefore the presiding law was Austrian law, and the High Court had no jurisdiction<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Lord Wilberforce<\/strong><\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>For contracts, Lord Wilberforce stated the general rule<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>\u201ca contract is formed when acceptance of an offer is communicated by the offeree to the offeror. And if it is necessary to determine where a contract is formed (as to which I have already commented) it appears logical that this should be at the place where acceptance is communicated to the offeror.\u201d [41]<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Telex: instantaneous or non-instantaneous communication?<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>Citing <a href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-entorres-v-miles-far-east-corp-1955-2-qb-327\">Entores v Miles Far East Corp [1955]<\/a>, Lord Wilberforce stated that the Court of Appeal held telex to be \u201cclassified \u2026 with instantaneous communications\u201d [42]<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Citing Entores again, Lord Wilberforce stated that if the acceptance formed the contract this would be under Austrian jurisdiction<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>\u201cThe present case is, as Entores Ltd. v. Miles Far East Corporation [1955] 2 Q.B. 327 itself, the simple case of instantaneous communication between principals, and, in accordance with the general rule, involves that the contract (if any) was made when and where the acceptance was received. This was on May 4, 1979, in Vienna.\u201d [42]<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Lord Wilberforce denied jurisdiction would be under English law after considering the possibility that the contract was formed upon the offer made from Vienna and acceptance by conduct in England:<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\r\n<li>\u201cthe letter of credit was not opened in the United Kingdom. Instructions were indeed given by the appellants to their bank in the United Kingdom to open it, and that bank gave instructions on May 4, 1979, to their correspondent in Vienna, but these steps were between the appellants and their agents only. They could not amount, in my opinion, to an acceptance of the offer of May 3, 1979. This took place, if at all, when the correspondent bank in Vienna notified the respondents: this they did in Vienna.\u201d [42]<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2>Significance of the Case on the Development of the Law<\/h2>\r\n<p><em>Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983]<\/em> is a landmark case that significantly refined the understanding of where and when a contract is formed in the context of cross-border electronic communications. Its implications are evidenced by its relationship with several pivotal cases:<\/p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-entorres-v-miles-far-east-corp-1955-2-qb-327\"><strong>Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955]<\/strong><\/a>: <em>Entores<\/em> established the rule that acceptance in contract law via instantaneous communication occurs where it is received. <em>Brinkibon<\/em> applied and reaffirmed this principle, determining that the contract was formed in Austria, not where the acceptance was sent from.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>The Brimnes [1975]<\/strong>: This case further clarified the moment of contract formation by determining that the communication of withdrawal of a contract becomes effective when it could have been read by the receiver under normal circumstances. <em>Brinkibon<\/em> complements this by handling the international aspect and instantaneous nature of telex communication.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Thomas v BPE Solicitors [2010]<\/strong>: This case examined email communications for contract terms, applying the principles from <em>Brinkibon<\/em> to modern digital communications, which shows the enduring relevance of the <em>Brinkibon<\/em> ruling in today\u2019s digital age.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<h2>Exam Questions and Answers<\/h2>\r\n<p>Below you will find answers to questions that are most commonly asked based on this case.<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>What are the implications of <em>Brinkibon<\/em> for contracts made via newer forms of communication like social media and instant messaging?<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p>The principles from <em>Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983]<\/em> are applicable to contracts formed via modern communication technologies like social media and instant messaging. Following the reasoning in <em>Brinkibon<\/em>, acceptance of contract terms sent via these platforms is considered effective when received. However, exact timings can be contentious due to varying timestamps and platform notifications. UK courts continue to adapt these principles to new technologies, ensuring the law remains relevant as seen in <em>Golden Ocean Group Ltd v Salgaocar Mining Industries Pvt Ltd [2012]<\/em>, which recognized contract formation through email exchanges.<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>How does <em>Brinkibon<\/em> influence the drafting of terms and conditions in international contracts to manage jurisdiction issues?<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p><em>Brinkibon<\/em> influences international contract drafting by emphasizing the importance of specifying the jurisdiction and governing law within the terms and conditions. Legal practitioners often include explicit jurisdiction clauses to avoid disputes about where a contract was formed and which country\u2019s laws apply, mirroring the practical outcomes of <em>Brinkibon<\/em>. This practice helps manage legal risks in cross-border dealings and ensures clarity in the event of disputes.<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>What are the limitations of the <em>Brinkibon<\/em> ruling in handling disputes arising from asynchronous communications, such as email?<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p>The <em>Brinkibon<\/em> ruling, while foundational, has limitations in addressing asynchronous communications like email, where the time of receipt can be ambiguous. The case law since <em>Brinkibon<\/em>, including <em>Thomas v BPE Solicitors [2010]<\/em>, attempts to address these ambiguities by focusing on when the message is actually read or could reasonably be expected to be read. However, this can create uncertainties in pinpointing the exact moment of contract formation, leading to potential disputes in determining the applicable jurisdiction and governing law.<\/p>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This analysis of Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983], essential for law students, explores contract formation through instantaneous communication across international borders. Legal Principles and Key Points in Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel Facts of Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34 Issues in Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13336","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34, contract formation was explored in the context of instantaneous communication and the presiding jurisdiction where the sellers were based in a different country.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34, contract formation was explored in the context of instantaneous communication and the presiding jurisdiction where the sellers were based in a different country.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-02T08:05:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-03T00:24:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-02T08:05:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-03T00:24:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34\"},\"wordCount\":1017,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-02T08:05:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-03T00:24:53+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34, contract formation was explored in the context of instantaneous communication and the presiding jurisdiction where the sellers were based in a different country.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34, contract formation was explored in the context of instantaneous communication and the presiding jurisdiction where the sellers were based in a different country.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34","og_description":"In the case of Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34, contract formation was explored in the context of instantaneous communication and the presiding jurisdiction where the sellers were based in a different country.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2024-05-02T08:05:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-03T00:24:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34","datePublished":"2024-05-02T08:05:40+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-03T00:24:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34"},"wordCount":1017,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34","name":"Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2024-05-02T08:05:40+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-03T00:24:53+00:00","description":"In the case of Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34, contract formation was explored in the context of instantaneous communication and the presiding jurisdiction where the sellers were based in a different country.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-brinkibon-ltd-v-stahag-steel-1983-2-ac-34#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Steel [1983] 2 AC 34"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13336","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13336"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13336\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}