{"id":13112,"date":"2023-06-26T11:46:43","date_gmt":"2023-06-26T11:46:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?p=13112"},"modified":"2023-11-23T09:46:27","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T14:46:27","slug":"case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057","title":{"rendered":"Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-legal-principles-and-key-points\"><strong>Legal Principles and Key Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In the case of R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057, judicial review proceedings challenging a public body\u2019s decision regarding accommodating a child in need could not be applicable to the court\u2019s duty under the Children Act 1989 section 1(1) to treat the child\u2019s welfare as the paramount consideration.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>C made an appeal involving judicial review regarding a judge\u2019s decision not to provide a compulsory order that C should be accommodated at a school opted by C\u2019s parents.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>D chose a school near C\u2019s home and believed C should attend this school and live in a children\u2019s home in Croydon.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>C\u2019s parents chose an alternative location, which received support from a consultant paediatrician, consultant child, adolescent psychiatrist, and an independent social worker.&nbsp;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Can the D\u2019s decision as to C\u2019s placement be questioned?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Was D\u2019s refusal to place C at the parents\u2019 preferred place unlawful interference with C\u2019s rights under the ECHR?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Did section 1(1) of the Children Act 1989 require the court to treat C\u2019s welfare as its paramount consideration when determining the above issues?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Held by Court of Appeal<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal on the grounds that D were entitled to make the decision they had come to; weighing the different factors caused a difference in opinion on C\u2019s placement.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Black LJ<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Council prioritised maintaining C\u2019s links with his locality and thereby limiting the geographical limitations of connecting to his family.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The court is not entitled to reverse a decision that is concluded by the Council under the Act; the court\u2019s jurisdiction involves the reviewal of irrational decisions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cWhere a local authority simply chooses one way of meeting a child\u2019s needs rather than another, it cannot be said to have interfered with the exercise by the child or the parents of their right to respect for their private or family life.\u201d [43]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cThe lives of children move quickly and their needs change continuously. Inevitably, this means that decisions about their needs have to be revisited. Sometimes they will remain valid, sometimes they will continue to have some influence whilst not being determinative, sometimes they will no longer be appropriate at all. It is therefore a matter for a local authority to attribute appropriate weight to a decision such as that of the tribunal, bearing in mind the nature of the decision that the tribunal was required to make (which, as here, may not be the same as that which the local authority is making) and any changes of circumstances since then.\u201d [58]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Editor\u2019s Notes<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A local authority\u2019s decision will not be deemed as inadequate where there are various determining factors when making a conclusive choice, and those factors are weighted appropriately by the local authority.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Principles and Key Points Facts of the Case Issues Held by Court of Appeal Black LJ Editor\u2019s Notes<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13112","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-case-summaries","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.4 (Yoast SEO v27.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057 | Careerinlaw.net | UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the case of R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057, judicial review proceedings challenging a public body\u2019s decision regarding accommodating a child in need could not be applicable to the court\u2019s duty under the Children Act 1989 section 1(1) to treat the child\u2019s welfare as the paramount consideration.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the case of R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057, judicial review proceedings challenging a public body\u2019s decision regarding accommodating a child in need could not be applicable to the court\u2019s duty under the Children Act 1989 section 1(1) to treat the child\u2019s welfare as the paramount consideration.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-26T11:46:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-23T14:46:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Boris Ignachkov\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\"},\"headline\":\"Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-26T11:46:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:46:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057\"},\"wordCount\":489,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057\",\"name\":\"Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057 | Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-26T11:46:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-23T14:46:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the case of R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057, judicial review proceedings challenging a public body\u2019s decision regarding accommodating a child in need could not be applicable to the court\u2019s duty under the Children Act 1989 section 1(1) to treat the child\u2019s welfare as the paramount consideration.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Careerinlaw.net | UK\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa\",\"name\":\"Boris Ignachkov\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Boris Ignachkov\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/careerinlaw.net\\\/uk\\\/author\\\/boris\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"In the case of R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057, judicial review proceedings challenging a public body\u2019s decision regarding accommodating a child in need could not be applicable to the court\u2019s duty under the Children Act 1989 section 1(1) to treat the child\u2019s welfare as the paramount consideration.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057","og_description":"In the case of R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057, judicial review proceedings challenging a public body\u2019s decision regarding accommodating a child in need could not be applicable to the court\u2019s duty under the Children Act 1989 section 1(1) to treat the child\u2019s welfare as the paramount consideration.","og_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057","og_site_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","article_published_time":"2023-06-26T11:46:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-23T14:46:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Boris Ignachkov","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Boris Ignachkov","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057"},"author":{"name":"Boris Ignachkov","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa"},"headline":"Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057","datePublished":"2023-06-26T11:46:43+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:46:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057"},"wordCount":489,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057","name":"Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057 | Careerinlaw.net | UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","datePublished":"2023-06-26T11:46:43+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-23T14:46:27+00:00","description":"In the case of R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057, judicial review proceedings challenging a public body\u2019s decision regarding accommodating a child in need could not be applicable to the court\u2019s duty under the Children Act 1989 section 1(1) to treat the child\u2019s welfare as the paramount consideration.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Case Summary Careerinlaw Cover Photo"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-r-o-v-hammersmith-and-fulham-lbc-2011-ewca-civ-925-2012-1-wlr-1057#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case Summary: R (O) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 925; [2012] 1 WLR 1057"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#organization","name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/12\/Careerinlawnet-United-Kingdom-Cover-Photo.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Careerinlaw.net | UK"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/#\/schema\/person\/8fdee476362bf382fd21700bd5a45bfa","name":"Boris Ignachkov","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33b22c61b285e32cec7b03ee9d87678f2b2f6aeb3d82f210db749e350d39e0a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Boris Ignachkov"},"url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris"}]}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13112"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13112\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}