{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","provider_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk","author_name":"Boris Ignachkov","author_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris","title":"Case Summary: Re Thompson [1934] Ch. 342","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MW1U5FCjzM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-re-thompson-1934-ch-342\">Case Summary: Re Thompson [1934] Ch. 342<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-re-thompson-1934-ch-342\/embed#?secret=MW1U5FCjzM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Case Summary: Re Thompson [1934] Ch. 342&#8221; &#8212; Careerinlaw.net | UK\" data-secret=\"MW1U5FCjzM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","thumbnail_width":1920,"thumbnail_height":1080,"description":"In the case of Re Thompson [1934] Ch. 342, it was found that a \u2018purpose trust\u2019 that instructed the beneficiary to use the legacy for the promotion and furthering of fox hunting was legally valid, and the residuary legatees could take action if the legacy was not so applied."}