{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","provider_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk","author_name":"Boris Ignachkov","author_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris","title":"Case Summary: Re Denley [1969] 1 Ch. 373","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lyR2BuAZPh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-re-denley-1969-1-ch-373\">Case Summary: Re Denley [1969] 1 Ch. 373<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-re-denley-1969-1-ch-373\/embed#?secret=lyR2BuAZPh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Case Summary: Re Denley [1969] 1 Ch. 373&#8221; &#8212; Careerinlaw.net | UK\" data-secret=\"lyR2BuAZPh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","thumbnail_width":1920,"thumbnail_height":1080,"description":"In the case of Re Denley [1969] 1 Ch. 373, it was held that a purpose trust that is directly or indirectly for the benefit of an individual or individuals can be legally valid provided the individuals in question are ascertainable at any time (and the trust is not otherwise invalid for uncertainty)."}