{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","provider_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk","author_name":"Boris Ignachkov","author_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris","title":"Case Summary: Ingram v Little [1961] 1 Q.B. 31","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DCVHtnNzG9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ingram-v-little-1961-1-q-b-31\">Case Summary: Ingram v Little [1961] 1 Q.B. 31<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ingram-v-little-1961-1-q-b-31\/embed#?secret=DCVHtnNzG9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Case Summary: Ingram v Little [1961] 1 Q.B. 31&#8221; &#8212; Careerinlaw.net | UK\" data-secret=\"DCVHtnNzG9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","thumbnail_width":1920,"thumbnail_height":1080,"description":"In the case of Ingram v Little [1961] 1 Q.B. 31, it was held that where a mistake regarding the identity of a party to a contract (including false identities) where identity is of vital importance, the contract is void. Possessory title of goods sold through that contract does not transfer to the rogue or subsequent buyers."}