{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","provider_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk","author_name":"Boris Ignachkov","author_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris","title":"Case Summary: Ghaiden v Goldin Mendoza 2004 UKHL 30 2004 ac 557","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fyQLuZ6RxE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ghaiden-v-goldin-mendoza-2004-ukhl-30-2004-ac-557\">Case Summary: Ghaiden v Goldin Mendoza 2004 UKHL 30 2004 ac 557<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-ghaiden-v-goldin-mendoza-2004-ukhl-30-2004-ac-557\/embed#?secret=fyQLuZ6RxE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Case Summary: Ghaiden v Goldin Mendoza 2004 UKHL 30 2004 ac 557&#8221; &#8212; Careerinlaw.net | UK\" data-secret=\"fyQLuZ6RxE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","thumbnail_width":1920,"thumbnail_height":1080,"description":"In the case of Ghaiden v Goldin Mendoza 2004 UKHL 30 2004 ac 557, it is demonstrated that imposed under the Human Rights Act 1998 is an obligation to interpret the Rent Act 1977 to be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Human Rights Act."}