{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Careerinlaw.net | UK","provider_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk","author_name":"Boris Ignachkov","author_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/author\/boris","title":"Case Summary: Case C-53\/81 Levin [1982] ECR 1035","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wMC2Gj2N2C\"><a href=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-53-81-levin-1982-ecr-1035\">Case Summary: Case C-53\/81 Levin [1982] ECR 1035<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/case-summary-case-c-53-81-levin-1982-ecr-1035\/embed#?secret=wMC2Gj2N2C\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Case Summary: Case C-53\/81 Levin [1982] ECR 1035&#8221; &#8212; Careerinlaw.net | UK\" data-secret=\"wMC2Gj2N2C\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/careerinlaw.net\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/Case-Summary-Careerinlaw-Cover-Photo.jpg","thumbnail_width":1920,"thumbnail_height":1080,"description":"In Case C-53\/81 Levin [1982] ECR 1035, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decided that the applicant was a worker for the purposes of Article 45 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, because she performed services which can be categorised as \u2018genuine and effective economic activities\u2019. Her motivations for pursuing such activity were immaterial."}